Your Wizard rating is well-deserved! Thanks again for your help and contributions to human space exploration, best wishes from NASA.
Hot dang, I think you got it, thanks TomG!
Okay, I think I got it. Custom Validation, pass = If Entry 1 not empty and Rating 1 not empty; Add Another Logic Set "And If" Entry 2 not empty and Rating 2 not empty; Add Another Logic Set "And If" Entry 3 not empty and Rating 3 not empty, etc. through 10.Thanks again for the advice!
TomG and as clunky as it is on our end, there are advantages for the respondents. Cognitively it's a little more "ergonomic" as it's more like a paper/pencil form. If they forget something they can add as they go. If they're bound by the list they provide on page 1, then forget something as they're going through the ratings on page 2, I'd be concerned about using the Back button to add something on page 1 then losing/re-doing the ratings on page 2.
Thanks Tom! We agree, that's actually the first thing we did. However, our colleague leading the project really wants the entries and ratings on one form on one page. Sorry didn't clarify that in our initial statement.Interestingly it looks like the Custom Validation has Pass rules, but no Fail rules. I can require Pass = row 1 text entry not empty and rating 1 not empty + row 2 text entry not empty and rating 2 not empty, etc., but then it adds up to just Force Response for the whole thing. We only want to force ratings when text entry is not empty. Trying to figure out if/how Fail = rating 1 is empty when row 1 text entry is not empty + rating 2 is empty when row 2 text entry is not empty, etc. Certainly not elegant, and not even sure if it's do-able!
Hi TomG, I think I'm having the same issue as Maddy. We have a matrix where respondents list the foods they ate for a meal, then rate how much they like each food. They can list and rate up to 10 items (rows), and the rating for each item is a Likert scale (across columns). We'd like to force response Likert rating but only for rows where they actually entered something to rate. If you list 5 things, then force response (rating) for those 5 things. The global question-wide Force Response is no good because we don't want to force respondents to list 10 things if they don't have 10 things to rate. But we do want to ensure they rate everything they do list. Any insights/suggestions on if/how Custom Validation could enable this?Any advice would be most appreciated!Thanks,Behavioral Health & Performance LaboratoryNASA Johnson Space Center
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
