Spill the Tea | Badge of the Month | May 2026 | Experience Community
Skip to main content

Spill the Tea | Badge of the Month | May 2026

  • May 1, 2026
  • 38 replies
  • 613 views
Show first post

38 replies

AlonsoC
Administrator
Forum|alt.badge.img+29
  • Author
  • Administrator
  • May 19, 2026

My take on AI :

As users, we don’t pay anything near what it should cost. Most of the bill is footed by investors. I really wonder what will happen when reality catches up. Unless AI providers are able to drastically reduce operating costs, I fear we’re gonna have to be way more picky about when and why we resort to them.

I feel like I’m already living this! My Claude usage limit seems to hit instantly these days, so I've had to become more intentional about when I use it and how. Less word vomit, more deliberate prompting and for tasks that I know I can’t do (vibe coding) rather than for convenience (helping me word an email). 


Sachin Nandikol
QPN Level 7 ●●●●●●●
Forum|alt.badge.img+51
  • QPN Level 7 ●●●●●●●
  • May 22, 2026

The CX Tea -

Companies keep saying they are “customer-centric”, but still measure success mainly on ticket closure time instead of whether the customer’s problem was actually solved.

Fast responses don’t always mean good experiences. Customers remember how easy you made their journey, not how quickly you closed a case in the system.

Real CX maturity starts when organizations stop treating feedback as reporting data and start using it to drive operational change.


NewHomeCXManager
Level 3 ●●●
Forum|alt.badge.img+7

The CX Tea -

Companies keep saying they are “customer-centric”, but still measure success mainly on ticket closure time instead of whether the customer’s problem was actually solved.

Fast responses don’t always mean good experiences. Customers remember how easy you made their journey, not how quickly you closed a case in the system.

Real CX maturity starts when organizations stop treating feedback as reporting data and start using it to drive operational change.

Well said! The change management behind this with some leaders can be difficult especially during time of transition in survey platforms. The experience drives the sentiment.


SteveBelgraver
Level 5 ●●●●●
Forum|alt.badge.img+68
  • Level 5 ●●●●●
  • May 22, 2026

or how about spilling the beans 😁 This personal pet peeve on a popular company phrase "we're listening". 

Although many CX brands pitch their platforms as being great at ‘listening’ the majority are actually only really good at ‘asking’ - through surveys. 

With the advent of support experience outfits like SupportLogic that track sentiment we’re a step closer to actually ‘listening’ which is an exciting development. 

Adding AI to the mix helps on the ‘thinking’ front although some argue 'intelligence' is a misnomer... 

But many organisations still struggle in achieving meaningful follow on steps through 'acting’. Although done by individuals, I wonder if this is being done at scale anywhere with tanglible results. By 'acting', the Experience Management process (or capability) would not just be good at collecting data, but through understanding would develop insights and execute improvements without the customer ever realizing it. Ideally you'd have a process with enough data points, intelligence and automation that would continually improve the Customer Experience without having to ask about their experience! 
 


Sophieroy
QPN Level 4 ●●●●
Forum|alt.badge.img+32
  • QPN Level 4 ●●●●
  • May 26, 2026

The hottest take? The companies winning at CX in 2026 won't be the ones with the most AI — they'll be the ones who know exactly where not to use it.

 

Real intelligence, artificial or not, is knowing when to step aside and let a human moment happen. 🫖


NewHomeCXManager
Level 3 ●●●
Forum|alt.badge.img+7

The AI Take:
Like nearly every major technological revolution before it, AI is often framed as a force that will devastate the workforce. History suggests otherwise—initial panic tends to outpace reality. Instead, the productivity gains AI delivers will quickly become embedded in baseline expectations, raising the standard of output. The result isn’t less work, but a more efficient society capable of producing significantly more.

Full disclosure:  I copied my initial response into ChatGPT and asked it to make me look smarter!

Great insight, Radam! I recently attended a CX summit - and one key takeaway “AI supported by human connection makes effective CX strategies”.  We need a mixture of both and this will look differently for business goals.


NewHomeCXManager
Level 3 ●●●
Forum|alt.badge.img+7

The AI Tea:

AI really helps a lot to reduce the time required to perform an assigned task, even if you are not that knowledgeable in a certain field.

Concern- As this AI technology continues to advance, there may be instance where made-up information is being generated as facts and the usual public audience are not able to spot them as AI-generated content that easily.

 

I agree with you. When we’ve used it for some research it still needed some quick review & at times, AI pulled incorrect information. 


NewHomeCXManager
Level 3 ●●●
Forum|alt.badge.img+7

The AI Tea:  As helpful as it is, there is always a hidden fear in each one of us and maybe it’s because of less knowing about it, but more to learn ..

I agree, Deepak! I have become more comfortable with it as I test it out in my daily work. Always use my brain first but am curious as to the capabilities. It is good to stay informed! 


NewHomeCXManager
Level 3 ●●●
Forum|alt.badge.img+7

AI can streamline the work, but it should not be able to eliminate the work. If it can eliminate the work, then we need to reevaluate the work we are doing. 

 

For example, AI can easily create a an automated response to feedback. However, truly closing the loop requires taking action based on the feedback--not just acknowledging it. AI is an awesome tool, but it should not be considered the full solution.

I agree. Having the human component is also important.


SteveBelgraver
Level 5 ●●●●●
Forum|alt.badge.img+68
  • Level 5 ●●●●●
  • May 27, 2026

My take on AI :

As users, we don’t pay anything near what it should cost. Most of the bill is footed by investors. I really wonder what will happen when reality catches up. Unless AI providers are able to drastically reduce operating costs, I fear we’re gonna have to be way more picky about when and why we resort to them.

I feel like I’m already living this! My Claude usage limit seems to hit instantly these days, so I've had to become more intentional about when I use it and how. Less word vomit, more deliberate prompting and for tasks that I know I can’t do (vibe coding) rather than for convenience (helping me word an email). 

“word vomit”! 🤮 new word of the week for me, thank you ​@AlonsoC . And yes, quality prompting is golden 🌟 and is something I need to get better at


Forum|alt.badge.img+45
  • Level 4 ●●●●
  • May 29, 2026

My take on CX Tea - in my opinion one customer service that probably needs to be retired is  :: Making customers repeat the issue multiple times as they get transferred between teams.

Customers often have to explain the same problem to a chatbot. then an agent, then a specialist. It creates frustration, increases resolution time, and makes the company appear disorganized.

A better approach is:

  • Maintain context across channels and transfers.
  • Give agents access to the customer's previous interactions.
  • Provide a concise handoff summary when escalating an issue.

The standard should shift from "Please explain your issue again" to "I see the details of your case and here's where we are so far."


PeeyushBansal
Level 7 ●●●●●●●
Forum|alt.badge.img+50
  • Level 7 ●●●●●●●
  • May 29, 2026

EX AI: I think we ask lot of questions in engagement survey and not all questions are actionable.


AlonsoC
Administrator
Forum|alt.badge.img+29
  • Author
  • Administrator
  • May 29, 2026

My take on CX Tea - in my opinion one customer service that probably needs to be retired is  :: Making customers repeat the issue multiple times as they get transferred between teams.

Customers often have to explain the same problem to a chatbot. then an agent, then a specialist. It creates frustration, increases resolution time, and makes the company appear disorganized.

A better approach is:

  • Maintain context across channels and transfers.
  • Give agents access to the customer's previous interactions.
  • Provide a concise handoff summary when escalating an issue.

The standard should shift from "Please explain your issue again" to "I see the details of your case and here's where we are so far."

Yes!! Completely agree! So frustrating to have to repeat yourself over and over again. Great take, ​@Chhavi_Ch