I’m a brand administrator who wants to interpret and utilize EX25 at a more academic and professional level.In Qualtrics ex25, there are 30 total of 5 KPIs and 25 drivers, but there are too many drivers to explain 5 kpi to management only with correlation with 25 drivers, and too heterogeneous drivers to only correlate with high-correlation ones are identified in top 5.Recently, I learned about the structural equation model. I'm thinking about whether EX25 can be structured and explained
I made a user group last december in Korean. It’s July and still has been showing broken characters. When other EX administrators share their project, the name of EX admins show correctly. Th e only problem occurs when it’s user group. Any body has suffered from the same issue? or solved?
Our company tries to use Qualtrics' certified questions and answers as they are.I found an interesting phenomenon.Unlike other questions,Ex25 certified question - engagementthe answer in the middle(3/5) of the question that compares expectations and experiences is not ‘neither agree nor disagres, but ‘meeting/met expectations’.EX 25 certified question - ex gap Candidate Experience certified question - gapEmployees are not very different from the answers to other questions, but in the case of candidates, those who answered positively to other questions answered in the middle position, that is, they met expectations in the question comparing expectations and experience. If you look at it literally, I think the answer of meeting expectations has a positive meaning, so it would be more appropriate to be positioned at a positive 4-point level(4/5) rather than in the middle(3/5).What do you think?
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
