@Deepak Great, thank you again! I made a minor modification, which is to change MultipleAnswer to SingleAnswer, as this is a single answer multiple choice question. I also have a question: how would I use JS to change the CSS styling of the non-default option instead?
@Deepak thanks for your great reply. @Jon You can add this onload in Javascript and change the number in eq below to the choice which has default option. Here 1 is second option. jQuery('#'+this.questionId).find('input').eq(1).prop('disabled',true); Hope it helps! As a follow-up to this, is it possible to also change the CSS styling of the non-default and default answers across multiple questions? For example, I tried something like this by inserting it into custom CSS under Look & Feel, but it applied the styling to the top and bottom response option, rather than to the default and non-default response option.#question1 .ChoiceStructure li.Selection.alt label,#question2 .ChoiceStructure li.Selection.alt label { opacity: 0.6; /* Reduce the opacity of the non-default option */}/* Style the default option to make it more prominent */#question1 .ChoiceStructure li.Selection.reg label,#question2 .ChoiceStructure li.Selection.reg label { font-weight: bold; /* Make the default op
https://community.qualtrics.com/XMcommunity/discussion/comment/42346#Comment_42346CamM just getting back to this now. This solution works perfectly! I'm so happy! I've been trying to figure this out for months. This is a way easier solution than setting up 1000+ embedded data elements in the survey flow, because a multiple choice question can easily auto-populate choice values from 1-1000. Thanks so much for your help on this.
Hi CamM — thanks for this great solution and clear description. I have one question about this, which is what would happen if two (or more) participants take the survey at roughly the same time? (I'll note this is an extremely likely scenario in my case). I assume that because the quota value hasn't been incremented, the two participants would be assigned the same quota value (let's say, 7), and would then both be assigned to a value of "Participant7". This would then lead to both participants receiving the same username and password (i.e. the username-password pair that is associated with my Participant7 in the contact list). Am I understanding this right?
https://community.qualtrics.com/XMcommunity/discussion/comment/42201#Comment_42201Thanks for your help TomG!
https://community.qualtrics.com/XMcommunity/discussion/comment/42190#Comment_42190That makes total sense. That said, I think I may have miscommunicated what I hope to accomplish. The username-password pairs have already been created by a third party. Now, I want to provide a username-password pair to each participant to allow them to log-in to the third party's platform. It doesn't matter which username-password pair a participant receives, as long as two (or more) participants don't receive the same pair.To provide participants with a username-password pairs, I had considered using a contact list. However, because I'll be recruiting using an anonymous link, I have no authenticating variable to connect each participant with a username-password pair on the contact list.So my hope was to create this authenticating variable in the survey (such as randomly assigning an embedded data variable with a unique value of 1 - 1000 to each participant), with the values of 1 - 1000 associated with e
Thanks TomG. This is likely the best solution and I will look into it.I wanted to run another idea by you and see if you think it might work.The idea is to assign each participant to a unique identifier that can be known ahead of time, and to save the identifier as an embedded data variable. For example, participant 1 would be assigned a unique ID of 1, participant 2 a unique ID of 2, and so forth.If I know that I will be able to uniquely assign participant 1 through participant 1000 a unique ID of 1 - 1000, I can upload a contact list containing the username and password (both of which I have pre-generated) with an associated unique ID. I can then authenticate based on this unique ID, and pipe in the associated username and password.In a prior post, one person suggested nesting a set of embedded data variables (one for each unique ID) under a randomizer with "Evenly Present Elements" selected to uniquely assign the known set of IDs to each participant. However, with 1000+ participants
TomG Sorry to bother you, but I know you have a lot of experience. Do you have any suggestions to solve this problem?
Hi MSobotta, thanks for your help!I like this solution! My concern is creating the unique embedded data elements would be tedious as this project scales. Although I’ll be starting with roughly 30 participants, I’ll soon be using 1000+. I’d prefer not to create such a large number of embedded data elementsDo you see any other way?
Although I don't have the specific solution, this Qualtrics Support page may help.https://www.qualtrics.com/support/survey-platform/managing-your-account/organization-id-login/#SSO
ahmedA still no luck. Here's the HTML.
ahmedA Dang, didn't seem to work. Same result.
ahmedA I'm returning to this project now and am running into a similar issue.The solution you outlined does not seem to be working in one specific case.I am using a math operation to create an embedded data variable "total_incentive_self", which calculates the current total incentive amount that a survey respondent has received. "total_incentive_self" is calculated by adding together all previous incentive amounts (which are either equal to "0.00" or "0.10"). See screenshot below for the math operation.When presenting the value of "total_incentive_self" to survey respondents, the JS code you provided above does not seem to work as intended. The JS I am using for this question reads: Qualtrics.SurveyEngine.addOnReady(function(){ num = document.querySelector("#total_incentive_self"); num.innerText = parseFloat(num.innerText).toFixed(2);});If the respondent has earned $0.00 so far, the value displays as $0. Similarly, if the respondent has earned $0.10 so far, the value displays as $0.Do
Excellent! Thank you very much.
Thanks! Looks like this approach works well.If I place the JS in the onReady function, the answer choice that was previous selected briefly flashes (as though selected) before being removed. This is undesired because it may prime participants to choose the option that flashes.If move the JS to the Onload function, that seems to solve the problem. However, I'm wondering if I'm creating unanticipated issues by doing so. In other words, is there a reason the JS must go in the onReady function?
Is this approach still possible if the game question is located (and I believe must be located) in a separate block from the "next round" question? After each round of the game is played, an embedded data field ("total1") is set to calculate the participant's total score by summing points from each round of the game. The score will determine whether or not the "next round" questions (continue playing vs stop playing) are displayed. Specifically, the participant wins the game when they've reached over 250 points. At that point, the "next round" block should not be presented, as the participant has won the game.I've attached an image of my survey flow to display one iteration of the game-next round block cycle (which repeats up to 20 times).
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
