Ah! We had the brackets and parathesis in the wrong order...🤞 Hoping it works now.
Thanks for reviewing Tom. Same result (error message) when I remove the quotes.
Thanks TomG. I will try and work with JS. I don’t know this language however there may be someone here who does. Right now it’s throwing an unexpected token message….all the fields are spelled correctly, so unsure what it is. I will see if someone here can help. Thanks again. What I’m using below for reference only using my embedded info. Qualtrics.SurveyEngine.addOnload(function() { var fields = ["COURSEID", "COURSENAMEURL", "SITE", "COHORTDATE"]; var vals = "${e://Field/CATALOG_ID}".split("_"); jQuery.each("fields", function(i,name) { Qualtrics.SurveyEngine.setEmbeddedData(name, vals[i]); )};});
I know this post is OLD (even the screen shot is the old interface) but it really helped me out when I needed to recode my values and couldn’t figure out how to do it in the newer interface.….Thanks!
Thanks Matthew.....Seems it was a system-wide issue for certain brand accounts. It's been corrected. Thanks!
Thanks @ElliotVW! I've provided Qualtrics feedback using the Feedback side tab and I have a video of the behavior if they need it....we will see what happens. Good to know it's not happening for you. I will also ask my technical support area if it's an issue on our side.
I was pulling in around 40 fields (included questions, embedded data, etc). We had a trial period for the connector and since we couldn't get live data (and one of our users survey data wouldn't pull in accurately) we abandoned exploring the connector.
@Sarah_May - Yeah....our connection was spotty and the data wasn't completely live, so we decided to stick with the dashboards which are not ideal and can be cumbersome. We haven't used it recently so I can help with the recent issue. Sorry!
@TomG - Thanks so much for the info!
> @TomG said: > There is a limit to the number of response fields Qualtrics will export (I've run into it a couple of times). However, there is no limit to the number of fields legacy export will export. Tom-do you know the rough limit on what the Qualtrics export fields are? I'm getting a ballpark...100 or less, 50 or less, etc. Any ideas? They think this test may be around 60 questions. I need to know if I should advise them to split it up, or if an associate can take the test in one sitting if allowed by Qualtrics. I do have a 35 question test that seems to export ok. Any thoughts?
We just obtained this, and it's a manual refresh. If this is not live data with a way to refresh data easily, it's looking like it's not a good fit for us. Good luck!
Hello-New Tableau integration user. We also need to be able to have a LIVE data connector (not extract) for tableau server. What is the suggested way to have the extract refreshed if using the tableau web data connector. Seems this question has been unanswered for a while.
> @MsIreen said: > @AMLS I have it hanging sometimes for days.. So irritating.. Especially when they are deleted from the Data tab, but still from the Projects list you see a wrong number of responses... I agree. :/ It's happened before as well. I guess this issue was something different....Here was the response from support after i was asked to refresh, clear cache/cookies, add a fake field to the settings, save and then remove (so it could try re-indexing)......I was trying to refresh a distribution table for response rates. I don't think 100% believe this is accurate as I have done this before without issues. But here was the response. _"In taking a closer look at your Vocalize dashboard, I am able to see what is causing the issue. In Vocalize, distribution mapping behaves independently from response mapping, so even though the test response was deleted, it still will show up in the dashboard. Therefore, I would recommend adding a date filter to this widget such that it
Anything ever come of this? I still have one pending as well.....been 24 hours now. !
> @bstrahin said: > @AMLS you may consider changing this from a generic Facilitator 1, 2, 3, ect. to the Blocks connecting to a certain individual. Your logic would change slightly so that the Facilitator blocks are assigned to a certain person and not the number of the slot for that class. See the screen clipping below. You would repeat it for Facilitator 2, 3, ... > > But then your data for Instructor Doe, Instructor Smith, and Instructor Johnson are always collected in the same variable and you don't have to figure out how to net it on the back end. But you can also control the order that the facilitators appear in the survey dynamically with the nested branching logic. > > ! > If I'm understanding this correctly, this would work if we only had a few facilitators, but we have hundreds (Subject matter experts) that may facilitate a class. I will pass it on to the Q person I'm dealing with to see if he may understand your suggested approach better. I apprec
I do have them in different blocks. The integration file comes over, and if there is a facilitator listed for FAC#1 they get the block of questions, then it branches to FAC#2, and so on. If there is a facilitator listed, they get that block...if there is not a facilitator listed then the branching stops. Screen shot attached. Not sure if this is helpful. !
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
