Critical Product Feedback: Results Dashboard Transition (It’s Not Just "Change Aversion") | Experience Community
Skip to main content

Critical Product Feedback: Results Dashboard Transition (It’s Not Just "Change Aversion")

  • August 14, 2026
  • 7 replies
  • 194 views

Forum|alt.badge.img+1

As a Qualtrics power user for over a decade, I want to clarify that the widespread community pushback regarding the mandatory transition to the new Results Dashboard is not a simple case of users being resistant to change. This is a fundamental usability issue that severely disrupts established institutional workflows.

After investing countless hours troubleshooting the new interface, it is evident that the tool, in its current state, is a major regression from the Legacy Results-Reports.

The core issues I have experienced, which echo sentiments across the community, include:

  • Severe Customization Restrictions: The rigid, widget-based layout offers substantially less flexibility for customizing basic data visualizations compared to the legacy platform.
  • Compounded Click Fatigue: Basic tasks that previously took one or two steps now require a tedious number of clicks through nested menus, making the interface inefficient for power users.
  • Migration & Formatting Bugs: Early adoption has revealed critical technical flaws, including broken charts upon importing legacy reports and severe layout formatting/text padding errors.
  • Matrix Question Limitations: The current limitation restricting matrix visualizations to just three sub-questions is entirely inadequate for complex data structures.

The operational impact of these limitations is profound. At my institution, I support over 200 faculty members who rely on Qualtrics for academic research. Academic surveys are inherently longer and more structurally complex than basic customer satisfaction loops. Manually building and mapping individual widgets for every single question and sub-question is not just incredibly time-intensive—it is frequently impossible due to existing bugs and broken widgets.

While the Legacy Results dashboard was highly intuitive, user-friendly, and streamlined for rapid report generation, the new dashboard requires advanced technical proficiency. The casual users and faculty I support simply do not have the time or the specialized skillset to navigate the field editor and data-mapping architecture.

Until these regressions and platform bugs are definitively addressed, my only viable workaround is to export raw data into SPSS for analysis and visualization. While this solves my immediate reporting needs, it completely bypasses the Qualtrics ecosystem and leaves my faculty users stranded, as they lack the technical capability to replicate this workflow.

This transition is not about a lack of user adaptability; it is about a product that has lost the foundational user-friendliness that made it an industry leader. I strongly urge the Qualtrics product team to reconsider decommissioning the legacy platform until the new Results Dashboard achieves true feature parity and operational efficiency.

7 replies

Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • August 18, 2026

I second this.


Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • August 18, 2026

I just want to add that this could easily be worked around by adding “Simple” and “Advanced” options toward the top of the page. The page could load with the older Results interface, this would be the “Simple” selection. If/when people want to use the more powerful (but more demanding) widget system, they can select “Advanced.”


JoseS
Administrator
Forum|alt.badge.img+25
  • Administrator
  • August 24, 2026

Hello ​@SD_NJ, thank you for this detailed feedback post! I have shared this with our Dashboard PMs and will keep you updated with any details/responses I receive.   


Forum|alt.badge.img
  • September 23, 2026

SD_NJ, thank you so much for your thoughtful articulation of what I am experiencing as I slog my way through the process of creating/customizing widgets to try and replicate even to some extent the reports that I created in minutes with the legacy functionality.  As you have, I am looking into other tools to produce what I was able to produce with Qualtrics before this mandatory change and will likely have to pass on higher costs to my clients.  And as you have said, this complaint isn’t a matter of resistance to change; it is resulting from the limitations of the tool.

 

I’m new to this community, and I’ll make my own detailed post as time permits.

 


Just wondering if there’s any update on this? I keep seeing the threats to disable the old results experience, which just feels like no one has actually been listening to users and their concerns.

 

I’ve repeatedly provided feedback that the new results tab is convoluted and not what I am looking for in results, it adds multiple extra steps to replicate what was easy to do in the old results experience. I do not need any widgets, and I do not want to create dashboards, I just want a way of easily exporting my tables without having to use other tools like SPSS.


Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Author
  • October 26, 2026

​@Ursula Bischoff , thank you for echoing these important issues.  I feel the same way.  Unfortunately, I don’t see any evidence that the Dashboard Project Managers are using our collective feedback to address client needs.  I deeply appreciate that ​@JoseS shared this feedback with them.  However, that was 2 months ago and I don’t see any updates on this.  Fingers crossed that your feedback leads to a solution 🤞


  • October 26, 2026

I’m with all of you, especially ​@SD_NJ . I find this new results dashboard clunky and slow and lacking basic functionality that exists in the current legacy results reports. Like ​@Ursula Bischoff, I typically export data in a table/stats format, where I can see the number of respondents per question, which choices were selected, and the relevant percentages (e.g., X% of respondents who answered the question selected option A, Y% selected option B, etc. -- pretty basic stuff). As part of the analysis, I need to know not only which response options were selected, but which were not selected. And where users can select more than one response option, I need the percentages to be based on the number of respondents to that question, not the number of response choices. These are things that are simple to set up in the legacy results.

But by default the new dashboard won’t display any answer choices that were not selected. The only way to get unselected choices to display is to change the data value display to show empty responses. But then the dashboard recalculates all the percentages based on the entire survey pool rather than just the number of respondents who answered that specific question. Since the entire survey pool is often a much larger number than the number who answered individual questions, this is a significant issue. (Btw, here are other options in the data values display that might seem to address this issue -- "show null values" and "show rows and columns with no data") -- but as far as I can tell, they do absolutely nothing at all.)

This seems such a simple feature -- give me the choice of whether to have percentages based on the total survey pool, the number of respondents per question, or the number of choices selected per question. But there isn’t a way to do that in the new dashboard.

And if I export the data into a spreadsheet to calculate the percentages myself, it doesn’t even export the number of respondents per question. That information is displayed on screen but doesn’t show up in an export. So now am I supposed to manually copy the displayed number from the screen and paste it into the spreadsheet for every single question so I can generate the correct percentages? We often have extensive surveys with 30 or more questions for which I need to segment data in different ways. Does that mean I will have to perform all of these additional steps for every single iteration of each question in every survey? It will probably be more efficient to skip the results dashboard entirely and just download all the raw data through the data & analysis feature and just do everything myself. But that will still be tedious and time-consuming and limiting -- and entirely defeats the purpose of having a results dashboard.

I find it hard to believe that in designing what’s supposed to be an upgrade no one thought about retaining the most basic functionality.