Feedback on the new email distribution interface / experience | Experience Community
Skip to main content

Feedback on the new email distribution interface / experience

  • August 21, 2026
  • 6 replies
  • 82 views

Hi, I wanted to contribute to the discussion on the new distribution experience, as unfortunately it is causing a lot of problems for my colleagues and I!

Email distributions are the sole feature we use for data collection in our ongoing clinical trial and the new distribution experience has significantly lengthened the time needed to schedule questionnaires to go out, which we are doing individually for over 300 participants!

The old/legacy experience is much simpler and more user friendly for the following reasons:

  • The pop up window where the entire message and required fields are together (i.e., recipient, from, subject, message, advanced options) is much more cohesive instead of these sections being separated on many entirely different screens
  • The pop up menus with drop down options in their dedicated sections (such as subject and message) helps avoid errors as opposed to these groups being under the same drop-down on the new version
    • The drop downs are wide enough to read easily in the legacy experience 
  • Reminders are clustered with the original distribution, which helps avoid missing/double booking a reminder
  • Able to set a custom date for reminders (rather than number of days), with the calendar pop-up to select a date, which helps to avoid incorrect scheduling
  • Advanced options (link expiry) clearly visible from the beginning of scheduling the distribution (whereas in the new version this comes later and it not as obvious) which is important for us to control

If there is any way that the old/legacy experience can remain as the default distribution setting that would be much appreciated! Otherwise we feel the new experience needs vast improvements to be feasible for real-life, practice use -- we’re heavily dreading the amount of admin time it would currently add for us to schedule questionnaires for over 300 participants. 

Thank you!

6 replies

Forum|alt.badge.img+4
  • Level 2 ●●
  • August 21, 2026

I 100% agree. In my work, we schedule follow-up surveys via email and this new interface is not helpful in any way.

All four of the existing features that TaraJ mentions will become pain points for my processing in the future. Especially removing the calendar picker for scheduling. Some of my follow-ups are 18 months out with a couple of reminders. 

Another item is that in the “old/Better” format, I can see the # recipients from the summary screen without needing to drill down.

I realize this is a forum, but will be sending this feedback via support as well.

 


  • August 24, 2026

I agree with Tara.  We have literally hundreds of emails to send out to our participants and these changes are having a significant impact on the workloads of the team.  It would be extremely helpful if access to the old system could be maintained as a preference alongside the new one.


I completely agree with the points raised above. We also use Qualtrics to schedule questionnaires for participants, and the new distribution experience has made this much more time-consuming and difficult to navigate. With distributions being scheduled individually for a large number of participants, the additional admin quickly adds up. The legacy experience was much more straightforward and user-friendly, so it would be great if this could remain available.


I completely agree with this feedback. The time and number of steps required to schedule distributions and reminders adds to our workload that wasn't needed before. The legacy experience feels much more streamlined, intuitive, and practical for managing large numbers of participants.

 

It would be greatly appreciated if the legacy experience could remain available, or if these usability issues could be addressed before the new experience becomes the default.


Agreed as well - as other users have described above, this is a critical functionality for how we distribute surveys to research participants and minimising effort and user error via the tools that TaraJ mentioned is so important! 


  • August 24, 2026

Thank you so much for outlining these issues TaraJ! I am also in support of the legacy experience remaining available for the reasons mentioned above.