DG1989 I think the attached QSF might work for you. (I did an example of 4 scenarios but you can expand it to 12).
In the Survey Flow the respondent get randomly assigned to a voice (male or female). This will be the starting voice for Scenario A.
Then a random number generator is used to pick an integer from 1-4 to assign the start point where A=1, B=2, C=3, D=4. You can edit the 4 to be a 12 and it will serve your needs.
Then there are are embedded data fields for the text in male and female voice you want to appear. I recommend you put the whole block of text where the voice appears and not try to use piped text within the editor. Just pipe these in as a big chunk. These need to be filled in by voice and again you will need to expand it up to 12.
Next there is a block only used for testing, so you can see where you were to start and in which voice Scenario A should be.
Each Scenario is added as it's own block to make the last part of the flow work. You will need 12 branches that define the start point and then cycle through the scenarios starting at the start point (see flow to make this easier to understand).
Random_Gender.qsf

Hi bstrahin,
thank you so much for your detailed answer and especially for the time to make all these screenshots and the qsf file !!!

One more short question: Do you have any idea if it also would be possible to have A,B,C,D in a random order that is different for everyone, while still keeping the gender alternated?

Thank you so much!

Maybe to better illustrate what I mean: My first thought of making the flow was the one below:
However, the problem there would be that some people then, based on chance, may only see female options while some may only see male options and that is not at all what I want.

DG1989 I can't think of an easy and efficient flow that would keep the gender alternating when the scenarios are in a random order. You could have a simpler flow if you are open to having a random assignment of gender for and random order for scenarios. You could get the genders to balance 6 male and 6 female easily, but I am stuck on how to make sure you alternate genders between each scenario.

Hi bistrahin,
I was just playing around a bit more and now thought that another solution might be to have a flow like the one above. If I am not having a brain freeze then this would ensure that everyone is seeing 6 male scenarios and 6 female scenarios, right? The only downside here might just be that there is a possibility that someone will see first 6 female and then 6 male scenarios but that would then also only happen for very few participants, right?

DG1989 its possible they would get any permutation of 6 males and 6 females. So for example all kinds of chunking is possible, such as:

• MMMMMMFFFFFF


• MMMMMFMFFFFF


• MMMMFMMFFFFF

@bstrahin thanks a lot! I see how putting the text in the embedded data makes the flow way cleaner, however, to every male/female version there is also a corresponding picture and corresponding questions which is why I thought it might be easier to order it in the different blocks.

Again, thanks a lot for your help! I will leave the question open for now in case someone comes along in the next couple of days who has some out-of-the-box idea how to avoid the gender-chunking

DG1989 that makes sense to use the different blocks if you have different follow up questions. Images can also be stored in the embedded data field using HTML code, but again that's an annoying complication. So your approach of different blocks makes a lot of sense. In that case, You would gut out the branching that I have and you can make 2 branches with a randomize like above in the branch. The blocks you show would be the ones you want to be eligible. It should look just as clean...
(please ignore the verification block that snuck into the second picture where Voice=male. At this point I think you get it without updating the picture.)