Is there any way to use Qualtrics to assign research participants into four between-subjects conditions WHILE ALSO keeping the gender ratio for each condition roughly balanced?
Assuming I collect gender information as the first question on a survey, is there some way to use quotas or randomiser features or display logic to make this happen? I have tried to think it through but can't think of any way to do this.
Solved
How can I use Qualtrics to randomise participants into 4 conditions while keeping gender ratio even?
Best answer by Akdashboard
This seems pretty straightforward. You need 2 branches in your survey flow. 1 IF male and 1 IF female (however you define that in your data).
Then nest a randomizer block under both branches and use the randomizer to assign 1 of the 4 conditions evenly (make sure to check "equal present" 1). Both branches should look identical, with the only difference being the Male/Female branching logic.
This will make sure to assign each condition evenly among the genders, so that, assuming you have an even gender split, your responses will be evenly represented.
Note, if you have something like 40 males and 60 females, then you will still get an even distribution of the conditions within the genders, but your results will skew slightly higher for females.
If you want to control this further, you can use Quotas to cap the number of responses from each condition and gender.
View originalThen nest a randomizer block under both branches and use the randomizer to assign 1 of the 4 conditions evenly (make sure to check "equal present" 1). Both branches should look identical, with the only difference being the Male/Female branching logic.
This will make sure to assign each condition evenly among the genders, so that, assuming you have an even gender split, your responses will be evenly represented.
Note, if you have something like 40 males and 60 females, then you will still get an even distribution of the conditions within the genders, but your results will skew slightly higher for females.
If you want to control this further, you can use Quotas to cap the number of responses from each condition and gender.
+39if it is only single variable that is age.. you can put randomizer in condition to select 1.. and copy these conditions.
Like if(age=18-24)... Randomizer(select 1 and equaly present)--4 elements
Like if(age=18-24)... Randomizer(select 1 and equaly present)--4 elements
+6This seems pretty straightforward. You need 2 branches in your survey flow. 1 IF male and 1 IF female (however you define that in your data).
Then nest a randomizer block under both branches and use the randomizer to assign 1 of the 4 conditions evenly (make sure to check "equal present" 1). Both branches should look identical, with the only difference being the Male/Female branching logic.
This will make sure to assign each condition evenly among the genders, so that, assuming you have an even gender split, your responses will be evenly represented.
Note, if you have something like 40 males and 60 females, then you will still get an even distribution of the conditions within the genders, but your results will skew slightly higher for females.
If you want to control this further, you can use Quotas to cap the number of responses from each condition and gender.
Then nest a randomizer block under both branches and use the randomizer to assign 1 of the 4 conditions evenly (make sure to check "equal present" 1). Both branches should look identical, with the only difference being the Male/Female branching logic.
This will make sure to assign each condition evenly among the genders, so that, assuming you have an even gender split, your responses will be evenly represented.
Note, if you have something like 40 males and 60 females, then you will still get an even distribution of the conditions within the genders, but your results will skew slightly higher for females.
If you want to control this further, you can use Quotas to cap the number of responses from each condition and gender.
+39hi @Akdashboard , How to control balancing if say i have to consider 7 screener variables like age, gender, income...
Hi @Akdashboard, thanks for your suggestion! I did consider that methodology, but unfortunately as you note in the latter part of your message, this will not be as random as is ideal. Similar problem when it comes to using quotas to balance the number of males and females across conditions. That said, this is indeed the best possible way to approach randomness, so thanks for sharing your thoughts!
> @Akdashboard said:
> This seems pretty straightforward. You need 2 branches in your survey flow. 1 IF male and 1 IF female (however you define that in your data).
>
> Then nest a randomizer block under both branches and use the randomizer to assign 1 of the 4 conditions evenly (make sure to check "equal present" 1). Both branches should look identical, with the only difference being the Male/Female branching logic.
>
> This will make sure to assign each condition evenly among the genders, so that, assuming you have an even gender split, your responses will be evenly represented.
>
> Note, if you have something like 40 males and 60 females, then you will still get an even distribution of the conditions within the genders, but your results will skew slightly higher for females.
>
> If you want to control this further, you can use Quotas to cap the number of responses from each condition and gender.
> @Akdashboard said:
> This seems pretty straightforward. You need 2 branches in your survey flow. 1 IF male and 1 IF female (however you define that in your data).
>
> Then nest a randomizer block under both branches and use the randomizer to assign 1 of the 4 conditions evenly (make sure to check "equal present" 1). Both branches should look identical, with the only difference being the Male/Female branching logic.
>
> This will make sure to assign each condition evenly among the genders, so that, assuming you have an even gender split, your responses will be evenly represented.
>
> Note, if you have something like 40 males and 60 females, then you will still get an even distribution of the conditions within the genders, but your results will skew slightly higher for females.
>
> If you want to control this further, you can use Quotas to cap the number of responses from each condition and gender.
+6> @PeeyushBansal said:
> hi @Akdashboard , How to control balancing if say i have to consider 7 screener variables like age, gender, income...
You'd really just be doing the same thing, just multiple times, right? If X or Y or Z (etc.) then randomly assign correct blocks. Controlling the maximum number of responses from a single group with quotas.
> hi @Akdashboard , How to control balancing if say i have to consider 7 screener variables like age, gender, income...
You'd really just be doing the same thing, just multiple times, right? If X or Y or Z (etc.) then randomly assign correct blocks. Controlling the maximum number of responses from a single group with quotas.
Leave a Reply
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.