Hello, I am seeing in the console on my site the following error, seemingly related to Qualtrics. I have a support ticket but they’ve been unable to replicate so far. Any ideas what this could mean?
"Uncaught (in promise) Error: Loading chunk 12 failed.
(error: https://siteintercept.qualtrics.com/dxjsmodule/12.8fb54ff2c385347a3180.chunk.js?Q_CLIENTVERSION=--blocked--&Q_CLIENTTYPE=--blocked--&Q_BRANDID=--blocked--"
It’s likely that Qualtrics was unable to reproduce this error because it appears to happen client-side (so their servers have no record of the event). In addition, the error is caused by unusual browser or network conditions.
Background:
Chunk Load Error occurs when the browser encounters an error in fetching some JavaScript files, which were dynamically imported. The error can caused by missing or outdated files, or a problem with file integrity; checksum not matching
Users: If you are encountering this error as a user of an application, the most simple way to resolve it is to clear your browser cache (and also restart it for good measure) and try again
Developers: Since the most common occurrence of this error is when the chunk files are missing, developers can start by ensuring that the chunk files are being correctly served, and the URLs being used to download the chunk files are appropriate.
My errror:
"Unhandled Promise rejection: Loading chunk 10 failed.
(error: https://siteintercept.qualtrics.com/dxjsmodule/10.1ba09bXXXXX.chunk.js?Q_CLIENTVERSION=--blocked--&Q_CLIENTTYPE=--blocked--&Q_BRANDID=--blocked-- ; Zone: <root> ; Task: Promise.then ; Value: Error: Loading chunk 10 failed.
(error: https://siteintercept.qualtrics.com/dxjsmodule/10.1ba0XXXX9692.chunk.js?Q_CLIENTVERSION=--blocked--&Q_CLIENTTYPE=--blocked--&Q_BRANDID=--blocked-- at r.e
Now that’s too funny! FS shows things we’re never seen before.
Luckily for us, it looks like only a small group is affected, and there doesn’t seem to be loss of functionality, except maybe the survey intercept is not active for that one person. Big disclaimer that I call it harmless based on only a several sessions. I’m going to keep my eyes open.
In my earlier response, I called this problem harmless because it appeared that only a small percentage of users were affected. I’d like to clarify:
*I wish that Qualtrics would get off their rear ends and apply some energy and effort into addressing this. Notice that they were totally silent during this whole exchange, and we provided them with free QA services, and they didn’t even really seem interested or motivated to help out. I guess they were too busy collecting payments from users.
*I now see that Qualtrics used the Client Side error excuse as a cop-out. They could have easily done more.
*Speaking of, we caught Qualtrics asleep at the switch. The general public doesn’t know about this torrent of errors in the background. It’s only becasue of FullStory that they got caught.
*This incident hurts Qualtrics because customers’ developers and technical staff can now see that Qualtrics is one of the top generators of errors in a browser.
*Even if a small percentage are affected, that still translates to large numbers for a high-trafficked website.
*I called this problem harmless because I assumed it broke the survey rather then broke the webpage. My evidence was viewing web sessions in FullStory. This is a dangerous assumption because I viewed about ten web sessions, and that’s not enough to get confidence. I would have liked some experts to weigh in.
*I found that this problem creates huge amount of needless noise and makes it harder to find other problems.
If others find this problem or have more info, please add a comment.
In my earlier response, I called this problem harmless because it appeared that only a small percentage of users were affected. I’d like to clarify:
*I wish that Qualtrics would get off their rear ends and apply some energy and effort into addressing this. Notice that they were totally silent during this whole exchange, and we provided them with free QA services, and they didn’t even really seem interested or motivated to help out. I guess they were too busy collecting payments from users.
*I now see that Qualtrics used the Client Side error excuse as a cop-out. They could have easily done more.
*Speaking of, we caught Qualtrics asleep at the switch. The general public doesn’t know about this torrent of errors in the background. It’s only becasue of FullStory that they got caught.
*This incident hurts Qualtrics because customers’ developers and technical staff can now see that Qualtrics is one of the top generators of errors in a browser.
*Even if a small percentage are affected, that still translates to large numbers for a high-trafficked website.
*I called this problem harmless because I assumed it broke the survey rather then broke the webpage. My evidence was viewing web sessions in FullStory. This is a dangerous assumption because I viewed about ten web sessions, and that’s not enough to get confidence. I would have liked some experts to weigh in.
*I found that this problem creates huge amount of needless noise and makes it harder to find other problems.
If others find this problem or have more info, please add a comment.
Yeah we were also told it was a client side error, but I totally agree. It creates a lot of noise in our console and it is likely an easy fix on their end.
Hi there,
Again, please accept my apologies; I am committed to providing you both assistance to address current and future concerns.
Hello,
The resolution engineer commented with the following (excerpt from ticket):
“The error "Uncaught (in promise) Error: Loading chunk nx] failed" is an error that occurs when there is a network issue on the end-user's device.”
Hope this info is helpful in the meantime! Feel free to tag me or
Leave a Reply
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.